You were reading Catwoman, a book with covers that show a woman in a skin tight suit.

Totally something to read in public.

Being seductive = Being a slut

I gotcha

Ok I'm a little confused here, so perhaps some clarification may be in order.

A) Are you saying now that they've done it, she can't string Bruce along?

B) Do you think that she doesn't really want Bruce/ to be with Bruce and that having sex will hurt the chemistry of their characters?

C) Do you actually read comics out in public? (If its an iPad that's understandable)

Going as far back as The Long Halloween this has been something writers have teased for years. Eventually someone was going to come along and flat out show that yes, Batman and Catwoman have gotten it on. Its beyond the point of her trying to string him along too. Its long been established that they both genuinely care for one anther and Selina has shown no signs of even wanting to manipulate Bruce for a long time now. Also, Catwoman is impulsive. She's an anti-hero who, on on occasion breaks the law whenever she feels like. Hell, that was pretty much her entire character arc from Gotham City Sirens.

This batman catwoman thing reminds me of The Nanny. The entire show was based around the two (Fran and Maxwell) meandering around each other, and it all turned sour after they hooked up. Wonder if it'll be the case here.

Fran and Maxwell kissed as well. They also told each other they loved each other. But they never "did it" or got together for long. Part of what made it worked.

somewhat glad out of the reboot i've only read justice league and batgirl

(i say somewhat because justice league was too confusing to be any good and batgirl felt like a slap in the face)

because i don't know why they don't know each other, or why they started that far back, or

but the more important question is what was with that fucking flashback in catwoman #1, which I just read, right now

argh, why am I even reading any of these

The easiest explanation the book is this is the beginning. There was never any super hero teams prior to this point. Aside from Action Comics and All-Star Western this is the earliest story set in the new timeline.

so do all the #1 comics take place at different times then

All-Star Western is set in the 1800s, Action Comics is pretty much the earliest starting point for their "dawn of super heroes", each individual #1 is going to focus on the singular character in a current timeframe and as it stands right now Justice League is set 5 years before all of them (with the obvious exceptions).

So Green Lantern meeting Batman is pretty much the first time any of these characters have ever interacted. This is also the reason Vic Stone isn't the Cyborg yet.

EDIT

Minor Correction: Demon Knights would be the earliest book being set during the medieval period. Totally forgot about that one.

I gotta agree with you. Look, I'm no saint, but I sometimes think porn and awesome should be kept apart. Sometimes having your porn in your awesome, is better, sometimes it's worse, like dunking a chocolate chip cookie in scotch.

However, someone made this: http://www.menagea3.net/images/Starfire.jpg



Also, fair warning, the site it's on is a webcomic that's like an archie comic by way of a sex comedy, so NSFW if you want to see what else the author has written.

I honestly like what they're doing with Roy and I think something interesting could be done with Red Hood...but they did screw up Starfire sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad. It makes sense with Catwoman, sex appeal is a massive part of her personality and a big reason for many of her actions. The panel in question is a bit far but easy to see happening. With Starfire, it makes zero sense since her character is a kind soul who's hardened from the time she was enslaved and tormented, she's not some easy slut who remembers none of her friends. That's the real bullshit.

Also, is Justice League Dark out yet? I wanna see John Constitine hanging out with the DC magic guys.

Pretty much how I felt about it. I thought the book started out pretty strong; and I like the direction they went with Jason and Roy. But once it cut to the beach is where the book started to lose me. The handling of Starfire was pretty bad. My other gripe was that nothing happens past that opening outside from the final panel. I'm going to give the book a bit to see what happens in the first arc, but Lobdell needs to pick up the slack. Teen Titans was a better team book, so the guy still has the ability to tell a good story which is partly why I'm giving it a shot still.

Did anyone else read the bit of news about Dan Didio saying that there hasn't been a single Crisis in the DCnU? While I'm fine with wiping out a few of them that wouldn't have worked with the new timeline; what does this say about Hal Jordan? I know Blackest Night has never been looked at as a Crisis, but I get the feeling it never happened either, considering it would mean that a ton of characters would have to die and return between the timeframe of Justice League #1 and Green Lantern #1. Furthermore that means Zero Hour never happened. Hell if Infinite Crisis never happened, I'm guessing its safe to say that Death in the Family never happened as well. Or maybe it did. I don't know, but it makes things a bit more confusing. This must be what the aftermath of Crisis on Infinite Earths must have been like wondering how much of the history has carried over.